![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBtkiM4B7Sea4OViyYSxd7Hz48S8I7zHQdggQsaoFXwtJ7YtmYcqzZ422ByUAFVfOA3lxkEKReJY2dB3NrpNzSkldUX5dN-fwZGfeoG0fWCuLYXJvEOaXzTVd9X-wZMe08ChAewu_G2LoU/s1600/Still+Life+With+Book+And+Purse+By+Gerrit+Dou.jpg)
And yet, what are the precise circumstances of his stealing? If he lifts the purse while in the house, he acquires it right then and there, becomes liable to return double, and Shabbat violation – which comes only later, when he crosses the doorstep – would not relieve him of the penalty. The Talmud tries to construct various ways of his walking where this would be true but finds faults with them. The final conclusion is that this applies when he is dragging the purse on the floor since he only acquires it when he crosses the doorstep – and then the Shabbat violation happens simultaneously with stealing.
Art: Still Life With Book And Purse By Gerrit Dou
No comments:
Post a Comment