data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4657e/4657e6a91c9b6bc68339b3f65d65839bd62e8fa2" alt=""
Since the Torah did not just say “garment” but “and the garment”, we see that even a piece of three by three finger-breadths is included. But maybe the Torah meant a larger piece of clothing, three by three hand-breadths, which has some use for everybody, rich and poor? – No, that the Torah did not have to include, because it already included the warp and the woof, in that they can become impure: if such small unfinished piece is susceptible to impurity, then how much more so a finished piece of three by three hand-breadths!
But perhaps Torah wanted to include garments made of other materials, and not only the wool and linen which it mentioned explicitly? – No, by repeating the word “garment” in “garment of wool or garment of linen,” the Torah showed that only these materials are considered significant for the laws of tzaraat purity.
Art: Raja Ravi Varma - The Miser
No comments:
Post a Comment