data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14557/14557598a1043409284f85c5a369f79f8fbba081" alt=""
What is their respective logic? The first teacher (Rabbi Meir) interprets “her virginity” to strictly emphasize this initial maturity. However, the extra word “in” relaxes the law and tells us that only natural cohabitation makes her ineligible for the High Priest, but unnatural (anal) does not disqualify her.
On the other hand, Rabbi Elazar and Rabbi Shimon understand “virginity” as already denoting complete virginity. Then the next word “her virginity” relaxes the law and allows more mature age. Therefore, the third word, “in,” again makes the law stricter and requires all her virginity to be extant, excluding unnatural (anal) intercourse, which accordingly disqualifies her.
Today, when there is no Temple and no High Priest, this discussion is largely theoretical.
Art: The Widow by Ramon Casas
No comments:
Post a Comment