data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee477/ee477e3d3b0ab446553eaeabbe06522318b7a355" alt="".jpg)
If one has a baker living in his courtyard, and he gives that baker a coin, asking him to contribute bread on his behalf, it is not valid. Why? – The Sages instituted multiple ways of acquisition but took away the power of money payment to acquire things, rather, the actual delivery has to take place, for fear that a seller may stop caring after receiving the payment. Therefore, his coin did not acquire bread for him, and not a part in the eruv. By contrast, if he gave money to a private person, asking to provide bread, this works. The private person would be willing to contribute bread even for free, and the money is regarded as a payment for his service.
Art: The Baker by Frans van the Younger Mieris (1689-1763)
No comments:
Post a Comment