data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4655c/4655c3b7df1531faef2547fe7bd6c9a9f38d8790" alt=""
Blood that originates in the “room” is ritually impure, and blood that originates in the “attic” is pure. If blood was found in the “corridor,” it could have come either from the room or from the attic. However, since the room discharges blood frequently, and the attic only infrequently, the blood in the corridor is presumed to have come from the room, and is declared as definitely impure.
The practical consequence of this rule is that if the woman touched ritually pure foods, such as the Kohen's portion, or “terumah,” the food is declared definitely impure, and is burned because of that. Should it be only a doubt, the food would not be burned, but would not be eaten either, but the rule resolves this uncertainty.
Rabbi Yochanan said that there are three places in this Tractate where the rule of majority was used to resolve uncertainty, and ours is one of them. The Talmud then investigates what the other ones are, and why yet additional ones were not included.
Art: Peter Vilhelm Ilsted - Woman reading
No comments:
Post a Comment